Відео

go to the cell rejuvination video and turn comments on ,turning comments off on any video you produce is a big mistake you may glean vital informatiin that may crack the code ,i already have some ideas that i guarantee have not been looked at. i might have figured out the missing piece to your puzzle first off im nobody and require no credit for it ,the value brought to humanity is reward enough

💪🔥🙏👍👍🎉🎉👀👀👀👍❤️🙏🔥🔥💪💪💪🔥🔥💪💪🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

👀🙏🙏👍💪💪🔥🔥🔥❤️❤️🔥🔥🔥🔥🙏🙏🔥🔥🔥💪💪🔥🔥💪💪🔥🔥🔥💪💪🔥🔥💪💪🔥🔥🔥🔥💪💪

What types of cells do you use? HeLa or just random cells?

more ❤

Dr. Lourido-I've been studying toxoplasma, so I found this really interesting and helpful. Thanks so much! -Joan Tendler

Wish I had been a scientist instead of a silly "computer" scientist. It's a scam! There is no science in computer science!

1:50 Planaria, belongs to Phylum Platyhelminthes of kingdom Animalia... It has the highest regeneration power in entire animal kingdom.

I agree w making these weirdos not being able to reproduce... we got to start eliminating these people w mental health issues by making sure they cant reproduce. Keep up the good work children hospital

Waiting for the chance to meet her

Incredible science communication right here. Would love to do a collaboration with my podcast "Goggles Off"

nnnnice!! very nice story

why didn't any of these scientists take gene therapy for CV19?

It shocks me how a 550 million Kaleidoscope biosciences was destroyed overnight, lots of hard earned money gone here… I hope you can do something for KLDO investors?

Parasites 🦠 viral load

I'm looking forward to hearing more from Dr. Hrvatin.

You say there are too many people. Isn't disease one of the "natural selection" answers to that problem. Unless making money $ on diagnostics and lab 🔬 created medicines is the real goal. Seems to me if people are really concerned about cancer they would stop the causes of it. Healthy people in healthy surroundings, eating healthy natural foods don't get cancer.

Why do we need living machines..?

A great new recruit by the Whitehead!!!

Science Dave Grohl

This video is useful, now I can understand how we approach the lineage tracing with single-cell sequencing. Thank you!

As a Marfan Syndrome Patient I hope it will change our FBN1 Gene.

Thank U❤

As autophagy counters tumors, what research is being done to evaluate the effect of dietary actions like ketosis or intermittent fasting, both of which have been shown to dramatically activate autophagy?

Interesting. This concept of DIFFERENT proteins in the membrane of tumor cells than exist in normal cells was boggling me in the first minutes. Then, he says it is aberrant and little is known. So, okay. Explains why I never heard of this in college biology. But, if little is known, how does the scientific community facilitate the recognition of said aberrant (unique, hopefully) proteins on tumor cells?

*Imagine a beautiful green hill that has been covered in solar panels made with all kinds of toxic exotic substances, and giant Godzilla sized windmills built in China with energy from coal fired power plants and transported in oil powered ships all the way to America. Imagine the huge amount of concrete needed to site each windmill, and how much it will cost to remove one day. Ask yourself, how much energy can that hill produce on a still, windless night?* Think of all the people making money and gaining political power by scaring the public with climate misconceptions from the early 1800s. The greenhouse gas theory was born before the invention of weather balloons, satellites, and space probes, so it is based on wild conjecture before there was evidence to prove it. Back then we had no ancient ice core records that today show us that temperature drives atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, but carbon dioxide levels do not drive temperature. The warmer it gets, the more carbon dioxide is released from our oceans. The cooler it gets, the more our oceans absorb carbon dioxide. Over the past 420 million years, carbon dioxide levels have fluctuated between 300 and 2200 parts per million, yet life flourished, our oceans never turned into acid, and our forests did not die due to heat. Satellite and space probe data tells us we can accurately predict the long term average baseline surface temperatures of any rocky surfaced planet or moon in our solar system by knowing just two strategic facts: their distance from the Sun and their atmospheric pressure. This proves that a planet’s specific atmospheric composition of gases is irrelevant to temperature. What regulates temperature is the amount of solar energy a planet receives and the amount of atmospheric mass that surrounds the planet. The FORCE of gravity on atmospheric mass creates a thermal enhancement that keeps Earth’s oceans from freezing to the equator. These facts tell us there is no greenhouse gas effect anywhere in our solar system. For the fascinating scientific details, please Google *The Renewable Energy Disaster + Christopher Calder + 50webs*

At 5:55, she meant to say, “to prevent viruses from invading bacteria.”

amazing, stunning... wow

Still the same conversations been had maybe some progression of course but we still don't have kinder treatments that work on the metabolism of cancer Stem cells

the most effective treatments for Cancer stem cells have been found to be mostly from natural products; sulphurofane, reveratrol, curcumin, zingerol from ginger... some 25+ phyto chemicals use with DMSO as a targeted carrier.

Everyone here in cancer research needs to read "Tumor-Derived Exosomes and Their Role in Tumor-Induced Immune Suppression". Absolutely massive discovery in cancer pathology recently. It seems cancer cells are releasing small, virus like particles that can drive biological change in recipient cells, which include stromal cells, other cancer cells, and especially immune cells. These bodies have been shown to contain viral elements, OCT4 and other pluripotency genes, both MHC I and II molecules from cancer cells, CD95L, and many oncogenes. These bodies have been shown to grossly disregulate and even kill effector immune cells.

where is part I of this talk? A link would be great

RIP to an extraordinary scientist...

Beautiful informative lecture.Thank you for your book, the biology of Cancer.

SAD SAD SAD, PATHOLOGISTS COULD HAVE EXPLAINED CANCER STEM CELLS OVER FORTY YEARS AGO. EXFOLIATIVE CYTOLOGY IS BASED ON STEM CELL SPECIALIZATION, GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION ABOVE THE BASEMENT MEMBRANE.

I like Bob's sense of humor ! A number of lectures showed that he preferred to save time for updating his work to the audiences other than letting the host give opening introduction of his fruitful achievements.

EMT is now well known to be correlated to the production of CSCs. However, something to keep in mind is that EMT might only cause the adoption of SC markers: CD24/CD44, SC gene expression, morphology, but whether the cells themselves are actually stem cells in vitro and in vivo remains to be tested. Something else to think about is if EMT creates stem cells from epithelial breast cancer cells and mesenchymal (not stem) cells from epithelial cells in development, what caused the obvious difference. Where does the parallel end?

Can someone please provide the link for the research article referred at 07:50 ? The reference mentioned below figure is not readable. Thank you :)

Where can I found the papers swowed ?

seeing this i have got all d symptoms i just wish i die but not of this esp.

See that's interesting. I'm a year shy of earning my PharmD, and the thought of doing an oncology research Master's on the side has tickled my mind over the last couple of years. For me it very much depends on how promising the prospective breakthroughs look over the next couple of decades or so -- can you comment a little bit on this for me as a Cancer Biology major? I would really appreciate it. Thanks.

Actually, I'm graduating this year from Cancer biology Master's and I'm keen to go ahead with a PhD

R.Weinberg is a primus inter pares.

Are you currently by any chance a cancer researcher yourself?

However, R. Weiberg is the origin of my interest in cancer research (more precisely his "hallmarks of cancer, 2000")+all lab directors should be like him towards their students. Their work on EMT is interesting.

I still have a lot to learn+ there are still things I don't get, but to me, "cancer initiating cells" are a consequence (=agressiv evolution) of cancer but definitly not the origin of it. The name they give to these cells is the only new concept but the phenotype of these cells could not have been a mystery for so long...

Just amazing, how in 1 hr 19 mins I got to know what i was working on for over a month!!

How I wished I was taking 7.012 in MIT (though I was so much younger then)